Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. . Coppersmith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1940PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

Tbe referee’s findings of fact, approved and adopted by tbe court below, are supported by competent evidence, and hence are conclusive on appeal. Kenney v. Hotel Co., 194 N. C., 44, 138 S. E., 349.

From these findings it appears that plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract whereby it was agreed that tbe defendant should buy certain sawmill and logging equipment, buildings and lumber, and that plaintiff should have charge of the salvaging, preparing for sale and selling the property, each party to pay his own personal 'expenses, and that upon effecting sale defendant was to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lance v. Butler.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Kenney v. Balsam Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Gorham v. . GoodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Gurganus v. Greenville Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Troitino v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Biggs v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Rothrock v. . NaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. La Familia Cosmovision, Inc. v. the Inspiration NetworksNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014
  5. Hall v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API