Legal Opinion

Rothrock v. . Naylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 12, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

This is the determinative question on this appeal: Is the evidence offered by plaintiff taken in the light most favorable to him, as we must do in considering a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, sufficient to take the case to the jury upon an issue as to the existence of a partnership between Bonin Realty Company and, defendant E. F. Strickland in respect to the construction of the houses and sale of the houses and lots on which the houses were constructed ? Careful consideration of the evidence leads to the conclusion that the court below properly ruled in the negative.

“To make a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Trust Co. v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Lance v. Butler.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Southern Fertilizer Co. v. ReamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Kootz v. . TuvianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Wilkinson v. . CoppersmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson Ex Rel. Dickson v. GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Guilford Builders Supply Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. La Familia Cosmovision, Inc. v. the Inspiration NetworksNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Cherry Cmty. Org. v. SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API