Legal Opinion

Hall v. City of Fayetteville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1958No. 600PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendants assign as error the referee’s findings of fact numbered five and six, which were approved by the.Judge, that there is not in the evidence any map, plan or description showing the location, description or width of Gillespie Street, as surveyed and laid out by the commissioners appointed by the Private Acts of the General Assembly of North Carolina, Sessions 1783 and 1784, and that there is not in the evidence any map, plan or description showing the location, width or description of the same street as surveyed, laid off or adopted at any time by the city of Fayetteville, except…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Troitino v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Sabariego v. MaverickSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. In Re Housing Authority of City of Charlotte.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Kirby v. Stokes County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wright v. Town of MatthewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Wilson v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Wilson Ford Tractor, Inc. v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Dorsey v. . Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API