Gorham v. . Goodwin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
CONTROVERSY without action, beard' before Connor, J., at April Term, 1917, of Cumberland. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant administratrix excepted and appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.
From the “case agreed” it appears that at some time prior to this proceeding, apparently about 13 May, 1913, plaintiff E. E. Gor-ham, and John C. Gorham, intestate, and E. H. Cotton, intestate of defendant, having executed their joint note to the First National Bank of Fayetteville to procure money for the purpose, bought and took title to the three in equal interests of seven unimproved lots in and near Fayetteville, N. C.; that the individual plaintiff, E. E. Gorham, has paid his pro rata share of said note, and the balance due thereon is $466.66, principal and interest, and which is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Clark v. SidwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Southern Fertilizer Co. v. ReamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State Ex Rel. Scott & Burton v. KenanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson Ex Rel. Dickson v. GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Wilkinson v. . CoppersmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Royal v. . DoddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Rothrock v. . NaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- La Familia Cosmovision, Inc. v. the Inspiration NetworksNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.