Gurganus v. Greenville Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.
The plaintiff entered into a contract with one P. G. Sheffield to haul a certain quantity of lumber at a stipulated ■ price. He alleges that Sheffield failed to pay him according to the terms of his contract. Recovery is sought against the Greenville Manufacturing Company upon the ground that said corporation and Sheffield were co-partners in the sawmilling business and therefore both were jointly and severally liable to the plaintiff on his lumbering contract, admittedly made with Sheffield alone. Chemical Co. v. Walston, 187 N. C., p. 821. The Greenville Manufacturing Company denies the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Trust Co. v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Lance v. Butler.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Southern Fertilizer Co. v. ReamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Mauney v. . CoitSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Kootz v. . TuvianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilkinson v. . CoppersmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Rothrock v. . NaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Bolch v. . ShufordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Gurganus v. . Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Gurganus v. Greenville Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.