Legal Opinion

Regouby v. Dawson County Irrigation Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1935No. 29413PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chappell, District Judge.

This is an equity case heretofore tried de novo by this court. The opinion appears at 126 Neb. 711. The mandate of this court, dated May 9, 1934, provides: “This cause coming on to be heard upon appeal from the district court of Dawson county, was argued by counsel and submitted to the court; upon due consideration whereof, the court finds no error apparent in the record of the proceedings and judgment of said district court in refusing the injunction, but does find error apparent in misapplying proper rules of damages. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McDonald v. FarringtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Bliss v. Live Stock National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State ex rel. Horton v. DickinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. German National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Gadsden v. ThrushNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Gooch Feed Mill Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Bohmont v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Jurgensen v. AinscowNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. De Lair v. De LairNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Berg v. Midwest Laundry Equipment Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API