Legal Opinion

Bohmont v. Moore

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1942No. 31275PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

The defendant Martell State Bank moved for a judgment in its favor on the mandate' issued by this court on a former appeal. The plaintiff brings the case to this court for review, alleging that the judgment against him was erroneously entered.

The record shows that plaintiff commenced an action against the Martell State Bank, William H. H. Moore and J. Carl Sittler to recover damages for the breach of a bailment contract. It was alleged in the petition that plaintiff rented a safety deposit box from the Martell State Bank several years prior to November 2, 1938, that he placed $14,000 in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bohmont v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Blum v. TruelsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Kuhns v. Live Stock National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bliss v. Live Stock National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. U. S. Tire Dealers Mutual Corp. v. LauneNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Callahan v. PrewittNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Stacey v. PantanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Gillan v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. In Re Interest of JLMNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. O'DELL v. GoodsellNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API