Legal Opinion

Gadsden v. Thrush

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1904No. 12,583PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Dodge county: Conrad Hollenbeck, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.

The question before us arises upon the motion of the plaintiff, the Schuyler National Bank, for an order directing the district court to vacate its last decree entered herein, and to reinstate and enforce its first decree. The. first decree of that court was, upon appeal to this court, reversed, and the cause remanded to the district court. Gadsden v. Thrush, 56 Neb. 565. Thereupon, a decree was entered in the district court in conformity with the judgment of this court, which, upon a second appeal to this court, was affirmed. Gadsden v. Thrush, 63 Neb. 881. From the judgment of this court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Schuyler National Bank v. GadsdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Gadsden v. ThrushNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Gadsden v. ThrushNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jurgensen v. AinscowNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. O'NEIL v. Union National Life Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  3. De Lair v. De LairNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Regouby v. Dawson County Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Pickel v. PickelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API