State ex rel. Horton v. Dickinson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Original application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to vacate a restraining order allowed in a certain action, and to proceed to a hearing in said action in accordance with a mandate issued by this court. Sullivan, C. J., dissenting.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
The relator prays a writ of mandamus addressed to the respondent, as judge of the district court of Douglas county, directing Mm to vacate a restraining order allowed in a certain action wherein Hayden Bros, are plaintiffs and the relator defendant, restraining the defendant from further proceeding in a cause pending in said court, entitled, “The State, ex rel. Hayden et al., v. The Greater America Exposition et al.,” which had been remanded by this court for further proceedings in accordance with the mandate issued in said action, and also to reqMre the respondent to proceed to a hearing in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- In Re Washington & Georgetown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Ober v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Maclean v. SpeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Mason v. Pewabic Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Luminous Unit Co. v. Freeman-Sweet Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
- State ex rel. Jefferson County v. HatchWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- TransCanada Keystone Pipeline v. TanderupNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- Cain v. LymberNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. McDonald v. FarringtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.