Legal Opinion

Conery v. Bath Associates

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided September 10, 1992No. S88-469 (RLM)PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MILLER, District Judge.

This causé comes before the court on summary judgment motions filed by various'parties to this action. Plaintiffs Greg, Kevin, Sean, and Kelly Conery move for summary judgment against defendant Bath Associates (“Bath”) and related defendants; Bath has moved for partial summary judgment against the Conerys; defendant Benefit Trust Life Insurance Co. (“BTL”) has moved for summary judgment on claims against it by the Conerys and Bath; and third-party defendant Stop Loss International (“SLI”) has moved for summary judgment,on BTL’s third-party claim…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Larsen v. Senate Of The Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. Ehrlich v. HoweDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. Duff v. Lobdell-Emery Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
  4. Martin v. DeBruynDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
  5. Dana Corp. v. American Standard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API