Legal Opinion

Martin v. DeBruyn

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 14, 1995No. 3:93-cv-00598PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MILLER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Lester Martin filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking damages and injunctive relief. The defendants are Indiana Department of Correction (“IDOC”) Commissioner H. Christian De-Bruyn, and nine officials of the IDOC or Indiana State Prison (“ISP”). Mr. Martin moved for summary judgment; the defendants have responded. For the reasons that follow, the court denies the plaintiffs summary judgment motion.

On May 17, 1993, Commissioner DeBruyn issued an executive directive and defendant W. Dean Neitzke, IDOC Director of Health Care…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. City of Revere v. Massachusetts General HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Waters v. BassDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
  2. Baughman v. GarciaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
  3. Reynolds v. WagnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Mourning v. Correctional Medical ServicesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. Hudgins v. DeBruynDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API