Legal Opinion

Thorp v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 1971PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*554SCHWAB, C. J.

Plaintiff, having had his motor vehicle operator’s license suspended under the provisions of OES 482.540 for refusing a police officer’s request that he take a breathalyzer test after he had been arrested for drunken driving, appealed to the circuit court in the manner provided by OES 482.560(1).① Over the state’s objection the trial court refused the state the right to a jury trial, and, having taken the evidence without a jury, found that the police officer who had requested the plaintiff to take the test did not have reasonable grounds for doing so. These two rulings are the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. State v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Heer v. Department of Motor VehiclesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Burbage v. Department of Motor VehiclesOregon Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. AnnenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. Witte v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In Re McCainNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Andros v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. Leabo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API