Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Heer v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1969PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

(Pro Tempore).

These consolidated proceedings seek to test the constitutionality of the Implied Consent Law, Oregon Laws 1965, ch 574 (ORS 482.540 through 482.580 and 483.634 through 483.646).

Lawrence Delmar Heer and Otis Paul Grayson each were arrested in the city of Newport for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of ORS 483.992. They were charged in the municipal court with violation of the state law. In previous consolidated cases they challenged the authority of that municipal court to hear the charge in its capacity as an ex officio justice of the peace…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Gottschalk v. SueppelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  4. Prucha v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Schutt v. MacduffNew York Supreme Court · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. People v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. StarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Pooler v. Motor Vehicles DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. BrennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Robertson v. State Ex Rel. LesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API