Legal Opinion
Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua & Siuslaw Indians v. Babbitt
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 29, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-2517(JHG)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua & Siuslaw Indians (“Confederated Tribes”) is an Indian tribe headquartered in Coos Bay, Oregon, with a governing body duly recognized by the Secretary of the Interior. The plaintiff asserts that the Secretary of the Interior improperly denied its request for certification of a particular parcel of land, known as the Hatch Tract, for casino gaming. The plaintiff asserts several claims against the defendants, the Secretary, United States Department of the Interior, and the Assistant…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Roseville v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Tomac v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- City of Roseville v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians v. United States Attorney for the Western District of MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002
- Wyandotte Nation v. National Indian Gaming CommissionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.