Legal Opinion
City of Roseville v. Norton, Gale A.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 14, 2003No. 02-5277PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
This appeal involves the intersection of two statutes concerning Indian tribes. The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721 (2008) (“IGRA”), prescribes the conditions under which Indian tribes may engage in commercial gaming on their reservations. The Auburn Indian Restoration Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1300Í-1300Z-7 (2003) (“AIRA”), restored the Auburn Indian Band located near Sacramento, California to federal recognition as an Indian Tribe and authorized the creation of a new reservation on its behalf. See id. §§…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Butte County, Cal. v. HogenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- TOMAC v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Medeiros v. Atlantic States MariCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Citizens Exposing Truth About Casinos v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Grand Traverse Band Of Ottawa And Chippewa Indians v. Office Of The U.S. Attorney For The Western District Of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.