Legal Opinion
City of Roseville v. Norton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 11, 2002No. Civ. A 02-0628(EGS)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are two California municipalities, the City of Roseville and the City of Rocklin, and an association of citizens from these cities and the neighboring City of Lincoln. Plaintiffs oppose the Secretary of Interior’s decision to take a 50-acre parcel of land into trust for the intervenor, the United Auburn Indian Community (“UAIC” or “Tribe”). The Tribe intends to build a 200,000 square foot gaming casino on the parcel, which is located in Placer County, California.
Plaintiffs sue the Secretary of Interior (“Secretary”), the Assistant…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Medeiros v. Atlantic States MariCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- City of Roseville v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Iyengar v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.