Legal Opinion
Tomac v. Norton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2002No. Civ.A. 01-0398(JR)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERTSON, District Judge.
In this suit, plaintiff Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos (TOMAC) challenges a decision by the Bureau of Indian Affairs to take land into trust so that the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians can build a casino. Several motions are pending. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment will be granted in part and deferred in part. Plaintiffs motion for discovery pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f) will be denied. Defendants’ motion to move the case to Michigan will be denied. The accompanying order…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- TOMAC v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Citizens Exposing Truth About Casinos v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- City of Roseville v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- City of Roseville v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.