Legal Opinion
Wyandotte Nation v. National Indian Gaming Commission
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 6, 2006No. 05-2210-JARPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION
ROBINSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon plaintiff Wyandotte Nation’s (“the Tribe” or “Wyandotte”) challenge to the final agency decision of the National Indian Gaming Commission (“NIGC”) concluding that plaintiffs may not lawfully conduct gaming on the Shriner Tract, a parcel of land that the United States holds in trust for the benefit of plaintiffs. The Tribe moves for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56; defendants have responded. 1 Oral argument was heard on May 16, 2006. After reviewing the parties’ submissions, and for reasons…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wilson v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Wyandotte Nation v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Butte County, California v. Jonodev ChaudhuriCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Muwekma Ohlone Tribe v. KempthorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.