Legal Opinion

People v. Cromer

California Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2001No. S076444PublishedCited by 188 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

103 Cal.Rptr.2d 23 (2001)

24 Cal.4th 889

15 P.3d 243

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Freddie Lee CROMER, Defendant and Appellant.

No. S076444.

Supreme Court of California.

January 22, 2001.

William D. Farber, under appointment by the Supreme Court, San Rafael, for Defendant and Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, David P. Druliner, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Carol Wendelin Pollack, Assistant Attorney General, Steven D. Matthews and Jennevee H. de Guzman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

KENNARD, J.

The confrontation clauses of both the federal and state…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by188 opinions

  1. People v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. GuruleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. FuiavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API