Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1927No. 19727PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The injury occurred on October 6, 1923. The amended relief Section 1465-75, General Code, evidently extends relief to those employes of employers who were such on or "at any timeafter January 1, 1923." Said amended act provides that, after certain findings are made by the commission under that act, if the Attorney General certifies "that the amount found by the commission cannot be collected in whole, compensation for injuries, diseases or deaths suffered during the period covered by such finding shall be paid from the surplus created by Section 1465-54, and any sum then or thereafter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Jeffrey Manufacturing Co. v. BlaggSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Industrial Commission v. MaddenOhio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Board of Education of City School District v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Northwestern Ohio Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Sherard v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State, Ex Rel., Davis v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State ex rel. Martens v. Findlay Mun. CourtOhio Supreme Court · 2024

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API