Legal Opinion

In Re Application for Discipline of Rice

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1954No. 36,332PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The accusation of the Practice of Law Committee of the Minnesota State Bar Association filed herein with the committee’s petition praying for the disbarment and discipline of Harold Hoidale Rice as an attorney at law sets forth:

1. That on or about September 22, 1952, Harold Hoidale Rice, as attorney for plaintiff in Moen v. Brazie, file No. 491844, district court for Hennepin county, obtained $139.20 from the sheriff of Hennepin county which the latter had collected as the result of a levy of execution issued upon the judgment entered therein.

2. That he commingled such sums with his own funds…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Discipline of Raymond G. O'MalleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. In Re Disbarment of Oscar BodinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. In re Discipline of BolandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. In Re Discipline of KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Application for Discipline of HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. In Re PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. In re Application for Disciplinary Action Against PetersonsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  4. In re Discipline of TimmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API