Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. City of Hoover

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 22, 1991No. 1901358PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, Kay Blankenship, Ann Marich, and Martha Stone, sued the City of Hoover, Alabama ("Hoover"), and Richard Smith, its finance director and custodian of records ("the finance director"), seeking a preliminary injunction; an order requiring Hoover "to produce [various] requested [public records and] documents for inspection and copying at a time and place convenient for Plaintiffs"; and a permanent injunction enjoining Hoover from "refusing to make its records available to citizens [of Hoover] for inspection and copying upon request" and from "ever again requiring [plaintiffs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brewer v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Stone v. Consolidated Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Gant v. WarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Lanier v. Moore-Handley, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Chambers v. Birmingham News CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. ROMAR DEV. v. Gulf View Management Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Graham v. Alabama State Employees Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  4. Horn v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Ex Parte GraysonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API