Ex Parte Grayson
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Carey Dale Grayson petitions for a writ of mandamus ordering the Honorable Mike McCormick to recuse himself from Grayson's case. Grayson was charged with capital murder. One of Grayson's lawyers, Scott Boudreaux, opposed Judge McCormick in the most recent judicial election and lost. Grayson contends that because Judge McCormick and his lawyer opposed one another in the election, Judge McCormick could not be impartial and should disqualify himself from the case.
We first note that "[m]andamus is the proper method by which to review whether recusal is required." Ex parte Melof,553 So.2d 554, 555…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Hall v. Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Acromag-Viking v. BlalockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Ex Parte BalogunSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hodges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Ex Parte KnottsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.