Horn v. City of Birmingham
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
We granted certiorari review in order to determine whether the Court of Civil Appeals erred in affirming the trial court’s ruling that the plaintiffs are not due an award of attorney fees under the “common benefit” exception to the “American rule.” Although summaries of the factual background and procedural history of this case have been presented in Horn v. City of Birmingham, 648 So.2d 607 (Ala.Civ.App.1994) (“Horn I”), Horn v. City of Birmingham, 718 So.2d 691 (Ala.Civ.App.1997) (“Horn II”), and Battle v. City of Birmingham, 656 So.2d 344 (Ala.1995), a detailed discussion is necessary here.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reynolds v. First Alabama Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Battle v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. Carl Cannon Chevrolet-Olds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Union Fidelity Life Ins. Co. v. McCurdySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Glover v. Midland Mortgage Co. of Oklahoma, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1998
- Habeb v. Accor North America, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Davis v. Carl Cannon Chevrolet-OldsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.