Ex Parte Horn
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
We granted certiorari review in order to determine whether the Court of Civil Appeals erred in affirming the trial court's ruling that the plaintiffs are not due an award of attorney fees under the "common benefit" exception to the "American rule." Although summaries of the factual background and procedural history of this case have been presented in Horn v. City ofBirmingham, 648 So.2d 607 (Ala.Civ.App. 1994) ("Horn I"), Horn v.City of Birmingham, 718 So.2d 691 (Ala.Civ.App. 1997) ("Horn II"), and Battle v. City of Birmingham, 656 So.2d 344 (Ala. 1995), a detailed discussion is necessary…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reynolds v. First Alabama Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Battle v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Shannon Leonard v. Enterprise Rent A CarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- State Bd. of Educ. v. WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- City of Birmingham v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Campbell v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1998
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.