Legal Opinion

Lanier v. Moore-Handley, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 1991No. 89-1552PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal challenges the trial court's determination of the amount of attorney fees owed by David Lanier to Moore-Handley, Inc. We affirm.

Moore-Handley sued David Lanier and Logan Lanier, as guarantors of a promissory note executed by Madison, Alabama, Construction Supply Company ("MACS").1 David Lanier and Logan Lanier filed general denials. Thereafter, Moore-Handley filed a motion for summary judgment, supported by affidavits. Subsequent to the filing of the lawsuit but prior to the filing of Moore-Handley's motion for summary judgment, Logan Lanier filed a voluntary petition in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Peebles v. MileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Reynolds v. First Alabama Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Eagerton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Van Schaack v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Dent v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jackson v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. State Bd. of Educ. v. WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Beal Bank, SSB v. SchilleciSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. City of Wichita v. B G Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. Blankenship v. City of HooverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API