Konold v. Superior International Industries Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. NOS. 6 AND 8)
ARTHUR J. SCHWAB, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Currently before the Court are Defendants Superior International Industries *307Inc. (“Superior”), Small Water Slides (“Small Water”),1 and Aquatic Facility Design Inc.’s (“Aquatic’s”) (collectively “Defendants’ ”) Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 6 and 8). Defendants argue that dismissal is appropriate pursuant to the Colorado River doctrine and Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and alternatively, ask for a more definite statement pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(e).2 Plaintiffs argue that the case should…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cohen v. SikiricaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Casey Price v. Walter Kane and Spouse Doe Kane, spouses and the marital community thereofDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- DAVIS v. QUINNDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- FLETCHER PARTNERS, LLC v. TRUIST BANKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- MCKINNEY V. CHESTER COUNTYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.