Legal Opinion

Konold v. Superior International Industries Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 2012No. 12cv1347PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. NOS. 6 AND 8)

ARTHUR J. SCHWAB, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Currently before the Court are Defendants Superior International Industries *307Inc. (“Superior”), Small Water Slides (“Small Water”),1 and Aquatic Facility Design Inc.’s (“Aquatic’s”) (collectively “Defendants’ ”) Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 6 and 8). Defendants argue that dismissal is appropriate pursuant to the Colorado River doctrine and Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and alternatively, ask for a more definite statement pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(e).2 Plaintiffs argue that the case should…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cohen v. SikiricaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Casey Price v. Walter Kane and Spouse Doe Kane, spouses and the marital community thereofDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
  3. DAVIS v. QUINNDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. FLETCHER PARTNERS, LLC v. TRUIST BANKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. MCKINNEY V. CHESTER COUNTYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API