Hayes v. O'Marr
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.
The only point involved on this appeal is as to whether the action was barred by the statute of limitations.
The appeal, which comes here on the judgment-roll alone, is from a judgment in favor of defendant. The action is based upon an alleged breach of contract to pay money. It appears that the defendant and his wife, Kate O’Marr, executed a promissory note in favor of plaintiff on July 1, 1913, for $1,000, payable in one year from date. Interest was paid up to December 1, 1921. It does not appear in what manner interest was paid until the last payment was made, which was on December 8, 1921.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Van Buskirk v. KuhnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Ball v. California Conserving Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Snyder v. DederichsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Pacific States Corporation v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Maurer v. BernardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Martin v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Butt v. BurkettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.