Martin v. Martin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDS, J., pro tem.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether a contract sued upon provided for payment conditioned upon receiving the money from a specified source or was not so limited.
Hattie A. Martin died leaving three sons, one of whom as executor and trustee of her estate, appears here as a plaintiff. Another son died and this action is against his estate for money alleged to be due and payable to the estate of his mother under a contract made by him after her death. The complaint recited the execution and delivery of this contract, which is set out in full, and demanded…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lynch v. Keystone Consol. Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Warman Steel Casting Co. v. Redondo Beach Chamber of CommerceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Hayes v. O'MarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Morrison v. Sycamore Canyon Gravel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by10 opinions
- Owen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Sunniland Fruit, Inc. v. VerniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Rains v. ArnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Norden v. MetsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Furst & Thomas v. ElliottIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.