Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Hartman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 24, 1985No. Nos. 84-7486, 84-7786PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

In this consolidated appeal, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) petitions for enforcement of its order finding that the Dependable Tile Company (“Dependable”) committed an unfair labor practice in refusing to comply with a collective bargaining agreement negotiated by a multi-employer bargaining unit. Additionally, Tile Layers Local Union No. 19, (“the Union”) petitions for review of the scope of the make-whole order entered against Dependable and of the dismissal of the complaint filed against Reliable Tile Company (“Reliable”). We grant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Local Lodge No. 1424, International Ass'n of MacHinists v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 449Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jack E. Hartman, a Sole Proprietorship, D/B/A Dependable Tile Company, Tile Layers Local Union No. 19 of the Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API