Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Jack E. Hartman, a Sole Proprietorship, D/B/A Dependable Tile Company, Tile Layers Local Union No. 19 of the Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 24, 1985No. 84-7486PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
774 F.2d 1376
120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2992, 103 Lab.Cas. P 11,627
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
Jack E. HARTMAN, a Sole Proprietorship, d/b/a Dependable
Tile Company, Respondent.
TILE LAYERS LOCAL UNION NO. 19 OF the BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED
CRAFTSMEN OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
Nos. 84-7486, 84-7786.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 14, 1985.
Decided Oct. 24, 1985.
McCarthy, Johnson & Miller, John J. Davis, San Francisco, Cal., Kenneth Hipp, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Thierman, Simpson &…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Local Lodge No. 1424, International Ass'n of MacHinists v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 449Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mossman v. City of OakdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- National Labor Relations Board v. Standard Roofing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990