Legal Opinion

Mahurin v. Oaklawn Jockey Club

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 22, 1989No. 89-79PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This appeal is from a summary judgment which held that the appellant, M.S. Mahurin, was barred by a statutory deadline from collecting money he had won on a pari-mutuel bet placed with the appellee, Oaklawn Jockey Club, the holder of a regulated horse racing franchise. Mahurin argues he was not given notice by, Oaklawn of Ark. Code Ann. § 23-110-406 (1987) which provides that a ticket not redeemed on or before the 180th day after the last day of a racing meet is void, and thus the statute does not apply. He also contends the statute deprives him of his property without…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Streight v. RaglandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  4. McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. Davis v. SchimmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. URREY CERAMIC TILE CO. INC. v. MosleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. East Poinsett County School District No. 14 v. MasseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Woodend v. Southland Racing Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n v. RutledgeDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2017
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API