Mahurin v. Oaklawn Jockey Club
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
This appeal is from a summary judgment which held that the appellant, M.S. Mahurin, was barred by a statutory deadline from collecting money he had won on a pari-mutuel bet placed with the appellee, Oaklawn Jockey Club, the holder of a regulated horse racing franchise. Mahurin argues he was not given notice by, Oaklawn of Ark. Code Ann. § 23-110-406 (1987) which provides that a ticket not redeemed on or before the 180th day after the last day of a racing meet is void, and thus the statute does not apply. He also contends the statute deprives him of his property without…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Streight v. RaglandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Davis v. SchimmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- URREY CERAMIC TILE CO. INC. v. MosleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- East Poinsett County School District No. 14 v. MasseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Woodend v. Southland Racing Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n v. RutledgeDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2017
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.