Legal Opinion

Woodend v. Southland Racing Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 6, 1999No. 99-63PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellant Daniel J. Woodend has been a patron of appellee Southland Racing Corporation for nineteen years. He is an experienced bettor who, by his own admission, has gambled around a half-million dollars at Southland over the past ten years. On September 27, 1997, Woodend placed a pari-mutuel “twin-trifecta” wager. A “twintrifecta” is a bet where the bettor selects three dogs to finish first, second, and third in exact order in the fourth race. If successful, the bettor then receives an “exchange ticket” or free bet in the sixth race; to win, he must again select three dogs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hames v. CravensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Warnock v. WarnockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Mahurin v. Oaklawn Jockey ClubSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lewis D. Yarborough Robert L. Williamson v. Devilbiss Air Power, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  2. Jesus Cuellar-Aguilar v. Deggeller Attractions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  3. Watkins v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Wynne Public Schools v. Lockhart ex rel. LockhartCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Bull Motor Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API