Legal Opinion
Davis v. Schimmel
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided July 24, 1972No. 5-5837PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
Appellant filed his petition in the chancery court on June BO, 1969, alleging that he was the owner of oil and gas leases covering an undivided .33517297 of the oil, gas and other minerals in certain lands in Lafayette County. He sought the appointment of a receiver to negotiate and execute leases on unleased interests in these lands. The proceedings were instituted under the provisions of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 52-201, et seq. (Repl. 1971). Appellees (or most of them) were named as defendants in that action. All of them, except Frontier Oil & Gas Co., Inc., were…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Love v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Davis v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Holland v. WillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Bright v. GassCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.