Legal Opinion

Bock v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 2001No. Docket 215630, 216558PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal by leave granted from the trial court’s orders denying their motions for summary disposition. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Plaintiffs were employed by defendant General Motors Corporation (defendant GM) in its Flint engine plant. This plant was approximately two million square feet in area and employed approximately three thousand individuals. The plant assembled V-8 engines, and various machining operations were performed on engine components. In the process of assembly, machining fluids were used to cool and lubricate, protect…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Antcliff v. State Employees Credit UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Travis v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. SSC Associates Ltd. Partnership v. General Retirement SystemMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Nelson v. American Sterilizer Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Ralph Wilson Plastics Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Herman v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. House v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. City of South Haven v. Van Buren County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Bradley, Jr. v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, a foreign corporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  5. Irrer v. Milacron, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API