Legal Opinion

House v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 19, 2007No. 06-1726UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

After Paul House was injured at work, he filed a tort action against his employer, Johnson Controls. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the company, holding that Michigan’s Worker’s Disability Compensation Act barred the claim. We affirm.

I

At Johnson Controls, House often worked with a team of employees that performed a procedure known as “die-flipping.” A die is a large piece of equipment that in this case weighed between 5,000 and 25,000 pounds. Die-flipping requires employees to connect the die to a steel I-beam with a cable, permitting them to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Silvia J. Thomas v. Chancey Miller and Elmwood CemeteryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Travis v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Herman v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Palazzola v. Karmazin Products Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howard-Johnson v. V & S Detroit Galvanizing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
  2. Bradley, Jr. v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, a foreign corporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  3. Tribuzio v. William Beaumont HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API