Legal Opinion

Nelson v. American Sterilizer Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1997No. Docket 199685PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Neff, RJ.

This tort action arises from plaintiffs inhalation exposure to a chemical known as ethylene oxide (EtO), a fumigant used, among other things, for sterilizing heat and moisture sensitive medical equipment. The trial court barred plaintiffs experts from testifying regarding the issue of causation, after ruling that the experts’ conclusion that chronic, low-level inhalation exposure to EtO causes steatohepatitis in humans lacked sufficient scientific grounding. The court then dismissed plaintiff’s action. In our original opinion, we found, in part, that the trial court had erroneously…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Walter Mixon Allen, Jr., Mattie Gayle Allen, Barry Lane Allen v. Pennsylvania Engineering Corp., American Sterilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Popma v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Mulholland v. DEC International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Craig v. Oakwood HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Chapin v. a & L PARTS, INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. FMB-First Michigan Bank v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Tobin v. Providence HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Avendt v. Covidien Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API