Legal Opinion

Antcliff v. State Employees Credit Union

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1982No. 64670, (Calendar No. 2)PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, C.J.

Plaintiffs appeal trial court rulings which precluded the advancement of a theory that defendant Spider Staging Sales Company, Inc., breached its duty to instruct on or give directions for the safe rigging of a powered scaffold which it manufactures and sells. The Court of Appeals concluded that a manufacturer does not have a duty to provide instructions for the safe use of its product apart from its duty to warn. We hold only that on the facts of this case this defendant was under no duty to instruct on or give directions for the safe rigging of its product.

I

This products liability action is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Smith v. E R Squibb & Sons, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Fisher v. Johnson Milk Co., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Gerkin v. Brown & Sehler Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Riddle v. McLouth Steel Products Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Simko v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Buczkowski v. McKayMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Johnson v. American Standard, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Glittenberg v. Doughboy Recreational IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API