Legal Opinion

Herman v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 2004No. Docket 243107PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals by leave granted from an order denying its motion for summary disposition, brought pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7), (8), and (10), in this wrongful death action. We reverse.

Plaintiffs decedent, an electrician employed by defendant for twenty years, was killed on October 15, 1999, when he was struck by an arc of electricity at the Mistersky Power Plant. Plaintiff, decedent’s widow, filed suit as personal representative of his estate. Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in finding that the operation of the public lighting department constituted a proprietary…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hyde v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Beauchamp v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ritchie-Gamester v. City of BerkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Reilly v. VadlamudiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Dextrom v. Wexford CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Martinique Stoudemire v. Mich. Dep't of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. Rdm Holdings, Ltd v. Continental Plastics CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Snead v. John Carlo, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API