Legal Opinion

Singer v. City of Minneapolis

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1998No. C4-98-1560PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

FACTS

Appellant Jack M. Singer purchased seven lots located in the City of Minneapolis (the city) at various tax forfeiture sales. Appellant failed to comply with a notice from the city directing him to abate nuisance conditions of overgrown grass and weeds on the properties. Eventually, the city’s contractor cut the grass and weeds, and the city assessed the costs for the abatement of the nuisance conditions to the properties. The city-appointed hearing officer and the city council upheld the special assessments. Appellant then filed an appeal of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Township of Honner v. Redwood CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. City of Shorewood v. Metropolitan Waste Control CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Saric v. StoverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Marriage of Hofseth v. HofsethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DRB 24, LLC v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  2. Marriage of Mingen v. MingenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API