Singer v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Appellant Jack M. Singer purchased seven lots located in the City of Minneapolis (the city) at various tax forfeiture sales. Appellant failed to comply with a notice from the city directing him to abate nuisance conditions of overgrown grass and weeds on the properties. Eventually, the city’s contractor cut the grass and weeds, and the city assessed the costs for the abatement of the nuisance conditions to the properties. The city-appointed hearing officer and the city council upheld the special assessments. Appellant then filed an appeal of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Township of Honner v. Redwood CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- City of Shorewood v. Metropolitan Waste Control CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Saric v. StoverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Marriage of Hofseth v. HofsethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DRB 24, LLC v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Marriage of Mingen v. MingenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003