Legal Opinion

City of Shorewood v. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1995No. C8-94-824PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COYNE, Justice.

In this proceeding, which arose out of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission’s estimated billing of sewage disposal costs for calendar year 1993 and the Metropolitan Council’s subsequent deficiency tax levy against all taxable property within the boundaries of the City of Shorewood, we review the court of appeals’ dismissal of the City of Shorewood’s appeal on the ground that the appeal was untimely. We affirm dismissal of the action on other grounds.

Until 1994 the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission operated the sewage disposal system that serves the seven…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Oakman v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Bulau v. BulauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. City of Brooklyn Center v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit OperationsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. County of Washington v. City of Oak Park HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Engvall v. Soo Line RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API