Legal Opinion
Podesta v. Mehrten
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1943No. Civ. 6616PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment quieting respondent’s title to certain real property in Calaveras County.
The facts, as shown by the record, may be summarized as follows:
On May 1, 1929, one Irving Hill, predecessor in interest of respondent, as the owner of the five parcels of real property involved in the action, entered into a contract in which appellant Mehrten was the party of the second part and appellants Bert Lyons and Gussie Lyons were the parties of the third part. Said contract granted to appellant Mehrten the right to sell at any time within fifty years from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Pomper v. BehnkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Kinsell v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Norgard v. Estate of NorgardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Acme Cigarette Services, Inc. v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Gantner v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Louisville Title Insurance v. Surety Title & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Fitch v. Pacific Fidelity Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Mutz v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.