Legal Opinion

Mutz v. Wallace

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1963No. Civ. 20083PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, Theodore Mutz, granting specific performance of a contract of the decedent, Marshall S. Hanrahan, to will to Mutz $10,000 and certain real property. Appellant, H. R. Wallace, is the executor of the will of the decedent; appellant and intervener, J. S. Mellen, is an heir of the decedent and the testamentary devisee of the real property in question.

A brief chronology of the facts is necessary for an understanding of the issues presented by this appeal. For many years, the respondent Mutz, a national of Canada, was domiciled in British…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Howard v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Wolf v. DonahueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ladas v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Henderson v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Miller v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Porporato v. DevincenziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Boccardo v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API