Legal Opinion

Norgard v. Estate of Norgard

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1942No. Civ. 6690PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Appellant was administrator of the estate of bis father, Chris Norgard. He filed a claim against *84the estate which claim set forth in substance that on February 5, 1938, claimant owed said Chris Norgard the sum of $1,866.44 on a promissory note, and that on said date said Chris Norgard stated to, and agreed with claimant that if the latter would take care of the business affairs of said Chris Norgard, under the latter’s instructions from that date “until the date of the death of Chris Norgard,” the claimant would be paid for such service the full amount due on said note at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. George v. McManusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Sedgwick v. SedgwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bernkrant v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Saupe v. KertzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. Bruce v. UlleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Podesta v. MehrtenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Cortez v. WeymouthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API