Borton v. Lavenduskey
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, James Borton (Bor-ton) appeals an order granting summary judgment favoring defendants-appellees Violet Lavendusky, and Violet Lavendusky as successor in interest to Jack Lavendusky (Lavenduskys) in a personal injury action arising from Borton being kicked by the Lavenduskys' steer.
We reverse.
ISSUE
The sole issue raised here is whether the trial court erred in granting the Laven-duskys' motion for summary judgment.
FACTS
Borton has been a farm hand on the Ackley dairy farm in North Liberty for 10 years. On June 15, 1982, he as a volunteer went with his…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Doe v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- STALLINGS v. DickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Kahf v. Charleston South ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Pierce v. ClemensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Power v. BrodieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Poznanski Ex Rel. Poznanski v. HorvathIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Ferguson v. Modern Farm Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Forrest v. GilleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Stainko v. Tri-State Coach Lines, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Darlene Perkins v. Kathy FillioIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.