Legal Opinion

Borton v. Lavenduskey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1985No. 4-485A90PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, James Borton (Bor-ton) appeals an order granting summary judgment favoring defendants-appellees Violet Lavendusky, and Violet Lavendusky as successor in interest to Jack Lavendusky (Lavenduskys) in a personal injury action arising from Borton being kicked by the Lavenduskys' steer.

We reverse.

ISSUE

The sole issue raised here is whether the trial court erred in granting the Laven-duskys' motion for summary judgment.

FACTS

Borton has been a farm hand on the Ackley dairy farm in North Liberty for 10 years. On June 15, 1982, he as a volunteer went with his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Doe v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. STALLINGS v. DickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Kahf v. Charleston South ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Pierce v. ClemensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Power v. BrodieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Poznanski Ex Rel. Poznanski v. HorvathIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Ferguson v. Modern Farm Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Forrest v. GilleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Stainko v. Tri-State Coach Lines, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Darlene Perkins v. Kathy FillioIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API