Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Modern Farm Systems, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1990No. 12A02-8702-CV-52PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCHANAN, Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Appellants-plaintiffs Clayton L. Ferguson (Clayton) and Brenda Ferguson (Brenda) [hereinafter collectively referred to as the Fergusons] appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment for appellees-defendants Modern Farm Systems, Inc. (MFS), Kern, Kirtley, and Herr Company (Kern), and David Riggs, d/b/a Riggs Construction Company (Riggs), claiming that the trial court erred in determining that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

We affirm.

FACTS

On October 27, 1984, Clayton was injured…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Dague v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Shideler v. DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Kroger Co. v. HaunIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Gaboury v. Ireland Road Grace Brethren, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Beckett v. Clinton Prairie School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. George E. Hemenway v. Peabody Coal Company and Peabody Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Estate of Shebel Ex Rel. Shebel v. Yaskawa Electric America, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Schooley v. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Vaughn v. Daniels Co.(West Virginia), Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Lilge v. Russell's Trailer Repair, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API