Legal Opinion

Forrest v. Gilley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1991No. 53A019006CV250PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee Trudi Gilley was riding a horse owned by defendant-appellant Gary *935Forrest. She fell and subsequently filed suit against Forrest for negligence. Forrest moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied the motion and certified the question for interlocutory appeal. We reverse.

Forrest presents the following restated issues for our review:

I. Whether Forrest, as the horse’s owner, owed Gilley a duty of reasonable care.

II. Whether Gilley presented any evidence of breach of that duty.

III. Whether Gilley incurred the risk of her injuries as a matter of law.

IV.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Burrell v. MeadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kroger Co. v. HaunIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Pahanish v. Western Trails, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Doe v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Power v. BrodieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. LedbetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Rambo v. CohenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Clark v. WiegandIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Sarracino v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Gunter v. Village PubIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API