Legal Opinion

Stainko v. Tri-State Coach Lines, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1987No. 64A03-8609-CV-280PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

This appeal concerns Andrew Stainko's fall into a work pit in the defendants' garage. The trial court, finding that Stainko had incurred the risk as a matter of law, awarded summary judgment to the defendants. We consider the following issues:

1. Whether Stainko was a licensee or an invitee on the defendants' property.

2. Whether the evidence and inferences, read in a light most favorable to Stainko, establish as a matter of law that he voluntarily exposed himself to the peril of an uncovered, unlighted, and unguarded work pit.

We reverse.

The evidence favorable to Stainko, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Plummer v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Kroger Co. v. HaunIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Beckett v. Clinton Prairie School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Kahf v. Charleston South ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Power v. BrodieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schooley v. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Ferguson v. Modern Farm Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Forrest v. GilleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Mauller v. City of ColumbusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Tina M. McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SANDVIK PROCESS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API