Legal Opinion

State v. Nastoff

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1993No. 20114PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

By this appeal we are called upon to determine the state of mind or “mens rea" necessary to establish criminal culpability for malicious injury to property under I.C. § 18-7001. James P. Nastoff appeals from an order withholding judgment upon a jury’s verdict finding him guilty of felony malicious injury to property. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, the district court’s denial of his motion for acquittal and allegedly improper remarks made by the prosecutor during closing argument. Because we conclude the state did not meet its burden to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State v. BootonIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. O'CAMPOIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. BeebeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. CroweIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. BillingsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. HughesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. BelueIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API