Legal Opinion
State v. Crowe
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided November 9, 2000No. 25419PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for aggravated assault. We.conclude that the defendant is entitled to a new trial because the jury was incorrectly instructed regarding the mens rea element of the offense.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Lance Ray Crowe was charged with aggravated assault under Idaho Code §§ 18 — 901(b) and -905(a), (b) for allegedly threatening to shoot his wife, Lorraine Crowe, with a rifle. The charge against Crowe was based upon an incident alleged to have occurred on the morning of April 26, 1998. According to the trial evidence, Crowe and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. ReyesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. MubitaIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. PoleIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. HalbeslebenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. DudleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.